Post a comment on the text below

Please add your general comments to the draft report here

Previous comments

  • bednamal (Malgorzata Bednarek) 05 Feb 2021 12:40:16

    POLAND

    There is at least one violation of the Creative Commons licence for pictures: <a href="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fe/Altakraftverket%2C_Norge.jpg" rel="nofollow">https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fe/Altakraftverket%2C_Norge.jpg</a>
    Properly it should be described as: Blair175, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons (<a href="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fe/Altakraftverket%2C_Norge.jpg%29;" rel="nofollow">https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fe/Altakraftverket%2C_Norge.jpg);</a> The questionable example is <a href="https://www.wikiwand.com/en/River" rel="nofollow">https://www.wikiwand.com/en/River</a>, as a picture <a href="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/ff/River_avon_at_keynsham_arp.jpg/1920px-River_avon_at_keynsham_arp.jpg" rel="nofollow">https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/ff/River_avon_at_keynsham_arp.jpg/1920px-River_avon_at_keynsham_arp.jpg</a> is from a public domain, which means it is not legally bid to credit an author, however according to the netiquette it should be credited to "Adrian pingstone", marked as a public domain and via Wikimedia Commons (even if it was downloaded from Wikiwand, which is a commercial mirror of en.wikipedia and uses Wikipedia content to provide a site for advertising, and linking to it is legal, but ethically questionable)

  • scheidand (Andreas Scheidleder) 05 Feb 2021 18:32:59

    definitions , wording and key messages used should be the same as in the report on water stress

You cannot post comments to this consultation because you are not authenticated. Please log in.