General comments

Please add your general comments to the draft report here

  • bednamal (Malgorzata Bednarek) 05 Feb 2021 12:40:16

    POLAND

    There is at least one violation of the Creative Commons licence for pictures: <a href="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fe/Altakraftverket%2C_Norge.jpg" rel="nofollow">https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fe/Altakraftverket%2C_Norge.jpg</a>
    Properly it should be described as: Blair175, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons (<a href="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fe/Altakraftverket%2C_Norge.jpg%29;" rel="nofollow">https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fe/Altakraftverket%2C_Norge.jpg);</a> The questionable example is <a href="https://www.wikiwand.com/en/River" rel="nofollow">https://www.wikiwand.com/en/River</a>, as a picture <a href="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/ff/River_avon_at_keynsham_arp.jpg/1920px-River_avon_at_keynsham_arp.jpg" rel="nofollow">https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/ff/River_avon_at_keynsham_arp.jpg/1920px-River_avon_at_keynsham_arp.jpg</a> is from a public domain, which means it is not legally bid to credit an author, however according to the netiquette it should be credited to "Adrian pingstone", marked as a public domain and via Wikimedia Commons (even if it was downloaded from Wikiwand, which is a commercial mirror of en.wikipedia and uses Wikipedia content to provide a site for advertising, and linking to it is legal, but ethically questionable)

  • scheidand (Andreas Scheidleder) 05 Feb 2021 18:32:59

    definitions , wording and key messages used should be the same as in the report on water stress

submit comment