5.Water stress in Europe

 

Key messages

 

  • Water stress in Europe affects more than 13 % of the total area permanently and up to 32 % of the total area seasonally since 1990.
  • In parts of the EU, increasing water use efficiency will help to keep pace with average climate change. In other regions, which in many cases are already water stressed now, water use is increasing and water availability is decreasing.
  • In all of the EU, climate variability is expected to increase, while urbanisation leads to a concentration of water demand in urbanizing areas. The expected outcome is that in southern Europe water stress problems remain persistent, while in other, increasing areas of the EU, water stress will make itself felt irregularly but with increasing frequency and impact.
  • farrereg (Regis Farret) 05 Feb 2021 14:28:01

    With what threshold is the water stress evaluated?  The 20% threshold for WEI is well acknowledged but 20% for WEI+ has a very different meaning, is there a scientific consensus or a recent EEA publication to justify a threhold for WEI+?  

    • zalllnih (Nihat Zal) 30 Jun 2021 12:10:22

       We also use the 20 % of WEI+ as indication for the level of water stress (Please see CSI 018 - Use of freshwater resources)

      With what threshold is the water stress evaluated?  The 20% threshold for WEI is well acknowledged but 20% for WEI+ has a very different meaning, is there a scientific consensus or a recent EEA publication to justify a threhold for WEI+?  

       

submit comment

 

 

5.1.        Current water stress in Europe

Using water exploitation index plus (WEI+)([1]) as indicator of water stress, at least 13 % of the European territory suffers from all year round water stress conditions, and at least 120 million people are affected permanently by significant water stress in these areas (Figure 5.1). Furthermore, many areas in Europe are affected by seasonal water stress, which recurs usually during the driest season of the year (typically in summer). Since the 1990s, 32 % of the European territory was affected during at least one year by significant water stress, while 300 million people were affected by water stress in at least one year (based on  (EEA, 2018b) results) (Map 5.1).

submit comment

Figure 5.1  Population and area exposed to water stress conditions in Europe (summers 1990-2015)

Source: (EEA, 2018b)

submit comment

Map 5.1  Seasonal water exploitation index in European sub-basins (2015)

Source: (EEA, 2019h)

  • farrereg (Regis Farret) 05 Feb 2021 14:23:10

    Exactly like in the draft report "Water and agriculture 2020", map 5.1 delivers a message that is contradictory to recent French publications. France also calculates WEI+ at river sub-basin level, and the results are surprisingly different for the summer period (we sent a map in a specific email). This issue is presently being deepened though a bilateral exchange that considers input data and other methodological choices. Before this exchange leads to a clear conclusion, it is necessary that a specific box is added, saying:
    <<  France processes its own calculation of the WEI+ at river sub-basin level, from 2008 onwards. Compared to EEA results, some differences are worth to be mentioned for summer, probably resulting from alternative data sources (national statistics vs modelling) and choices made for the implementation (e.g. irrigation period, ratio consumption/abstraction…).  In France’s dataset, a very hight summer WEI+ appears in a south-western sub-basin (important maize production area), whereas on the contrary we observe lower values than the EEA for North-Eastern basins (Meuse, Moselle-Sarre) or in the centre of France. >>

    • zalllnih (Nihat Zal) 30 Jun 2021 12:12:08

       We have addedd the following text under the map;

      "Assessments of the sustainability of water abstraction at the European level remain limited by data availability and the approach to Interpretation of water returns. This may lead to large differences in the European WEI compared to national datasets. An example of this occurs in the south‑western subbasin of France along the Atlantic Coast, an important maize production area. There the national estimate of WEI is around 50% because it adopts no water returns from agriculture, whereas the European estimate, which is based on 31% returns ratio from agriculture, is below 10%."

      Exactly like in the draft report "Water and agriculture 2020", map 5.1 delivers a message that is contradictory to recent French publications. France also calculates WEI+ at river sub-basin level, and the results are surprisingly different for the summer period (we sent a map in a specific email). This issue is presently being deepened though a bilateral exchange that considers input data and other methodological choices. Before this exchange leads to a clear conclusion, it is necessary that a specific box is added, saying:
      <<  France processes its own calculation of the WEI+ at river sub-basin level, from 2008 onwards. Compared to EEA results, some differences are worth to be mentioned for summer, probably resulting from alternative data sources (national statistics vs modelling) and choices made for the implementation (e.g. irrigation period, ratio consumption/abstraction…).  In France’s dataset, a very hight summer WEI+ appears in a south-western sub-basin (important maize production area), whereas on the contrary we observe lower values than the EEA for North-Eastern basins (Meuse, Moselle-Sarre) or in the centre of France. >>

       

  • scheidand (Andreas Scheidleder) 05 Feb 2021 18:30:24

    Unfortunately this map does not show country borders. As Austrian citizen I would like to see the Austrian borders

    • zalllnih (Nihat Zal) 30 Jun 2021 12:13:21

       The map aims to illsutrates the water stress condition at the hydrological basin level without considering the country boundaries. However, the country boundaries on the subbasins can be seen at the EEA indicator for use of freshwater resoruces. 

      Unfortunately this map does not show country borders. As Austrian citizen I would like to see the Austrian borders

       

submit comment

 

Southern Europe is the most affected region (Map 5.1), with approximately 30 % of its population living in areas with permanent water stress and up to 70 % of its population living in areas with seasonal water stress during summers. On the one hand, this is a result of naturally occurring low water availability and aridity, which are embedded in the local climate. On the other hand, the water consumption by human activities, such as agriculture, electricity production and public water supply, is frequently significantly higher than the local renewable freshwater resources.

submit comment

The pressures are particularly high between April and September, when water demand for agriculture, drinking water supply, and tourism or recreation, reaches a seasonal peak. Severe water stress problems are usually observed in areas with intense agricultural activities, which show high shares of irrigated land and high application of irrigation water, fertilisers or pesticides. In this context, agriculture causes water stress because of depletion of natural water sources (e.g. river dry-up, critical decrease of groundwater levels) or because of pollution of local freshwaters (e.g. high concentrations of pollutants, exceeding legally required water quality levels). Agriculture-driven pollution can make water resources non-suitable for other purposes (e.g. drinking water), unless significant costs are paid for their treatment. Severe water stress problems are also observed in coastal areas, because of high concentrations of human activities, including tourism. In such areas, local freshwater availability is usually low compared to the required water supply. In addition, the local water sources are vulnerable to saline intrusion. Therefore, pollution and poor water quality can also be a reason for local water stress issues in various parts of Europe.

submit comment

Furthermore, water stress issues increasingly occur in parts of western, eastern and northern Europe also. Compared to the average regional conditions, water stress levels are generally high in the wider area of Copenhagen (Denmark), London – Thames (UK) and Stockholm (Sweden), and the river basins of the Loire (France), Meuse (France-Netherlands-Belgium), Weser (Germany) and Oder (Germany-Poland), as well as in several sub-basins of Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria. This is usually a result of urbanisation, rising living standards and locally significant demand for public water supply and cooling water used in the industry and energy sectors.

submit comment

Between 1990 and 2017 the abstracted volume of water in the EU27+UK declined by 9 % and in the EEA39 by 17 % (EEA, 2018b). Furthermore, between the first and second cycle of WFD implementation (2010 versus 2016), the area of groundwater bodies affected by over-abstraction decreased by around 7 % (WISE WFD data viewer). These overall trends are encouraging because they show a tendency to reduce the pressure from water abstraction in Europe. However, it should not be missed that water stress is a local and seasonal issue. Thus, overall reductions are not always informative on the actual severity of the problem at finer spatial and time scale. Similarly, water stress in rainfed agriculture and in rain-dependent nature areas is not or hardly mitigated by reduced water abstractions. 

  • farrereg (Regis Farret) 05 Feb 2021 14:29:20

    The time series on water abstraction for agriculture in France, and provided to the EEA, starts in 2008. It is therefore formally impossible to conclude to a fall in the water used for agriculture from 1990.

    • zalllnih (Nihat Zal) 30 Jun 2021 12:14:09

       We also use the env_wat_abs data from Eurostat. 

      The time series on water abstraction for agriculture in France, and provided to the EEA, starts in 2008. It is therefore formally impossible to conclude to a fall in the water used for agriculture from 1990.

       

submit comment

5.2.        Future projections of water stress in Europe

Water stress in Europe is expected to further worsen in the future, as a result of climate change and socio-economic development. The JRC has modelled two different emission scenarios, resulting in three global temperature increases, with 3 oC as the highest, compared to pre-industrial levels (JRC, 2020b) (Map 5.2). For an increase in global temperature by 3 oC, the conditions of significant water stress will be extended and intensified in southern Europe, as well as in other parts of Europe, including areas in Bulgaria, Romania, France, Belgium, Germany and Poland. Moreover, the duration of seasonal water stress is projected to increase up to a month, with the highest increase expected in the Iberian peninsula and other parts of the Mediterranean. In these calculations it was assumed that the water use of the economic sectors increases with the ratio of GDP growth, so increasing water use efficiency was not included.

submit comment

Map 5.2  Areas in Europe with additional water stress in the future under a temperature increase of 3 oC.

Source: (JRC, 2020b)

submit comment

 

Combining the findings from the two previous chapters, the following estimate of the difference between water demand and water availability emerges, and how it will develop over the coming decades.

submit comment

 

The impacts of climate change on water availability

As a result of climate change, average water availability in surface water and groundwater bodies is expected to increase in north-eastern Europe, decrease in southern and south-western Europe, while mixed patterns are expected in the central parts of Europe. Under the 3 oC temperature increase scenario (SCP 8.5), the mean summer discharge in Spain and other parts is estimated to become 20 to 40 % lower than it is now. In parts of the other Mediterranean countries the impact is less pronounced, but with reductions in the order of 10 to 20 % still very significant (JRC, 2020b). Aquifer recharge follows roughly the same pattern.

submit comment

 

The potential of water saving measures

According to the available data (Figures 4.11, 4.13 and 4.16), over the 17-year period 2000 to 2017, water abstractions in EU27+UK have dropped by some 24 % while GVA increased by 52 %. No attenuation of the growth in water use efficiency is yet visible. The estimates of potential savings outlined in Chapter 4 are in the same order of magnitude. With an overall GDP growth rate of 1.3 % per year (EC, 2015c) and assuming that GDP growth is at the same level as NVA growth, the net decrease in water demand is estimated at 1.2 % per year. Words of caution are in place here:

submit comment

  • the collected data on water consumption are not covering all Member States and are partly based on proxies;
  • general estimates at the level of the whole EU do not represent the actual local impact of water stress. An example: in Sections 4.3 and 4.6 it was pointed out that the increase of irrigated area and in per capita household water use is the strongest in southern Europe, which already is the most water stressed region in Europe.
  • these estimates must be taken for what they are: rough indications of the direction that water stress is taking.

submit comment

That said, there are clear signs that water is being used more efficiently in the European economy. This makes some room for better accommodation of environmental water demands (which have not yet been assessed at EU level) and for climate change impacts.

submit comment

 

Comparison of the potential water savings with expected changes in water availability and water demand shows that in some parts of Europe, the current pace of water saving in the economy is sufficient to compensate for the decrease of water availability as a result of climate change. Environmental water demands have not been accounted for in this comparison. The water uses that directly depend on precipitation, such as rain-fed agriculture and terrestrial nature, do not benefit from these water savings. The impacts of increasing climate variability and spatial concentration of water demand for households and industry, too, are not mitigated by increased water use efficiency.

submit comment


[1] WEI+: the Water Exploitation Index Plus. The WEI+ is defined as the total water net consumption (abstractions minus returns) divided by the freshwater resources of a region, including upstream inflowing water. WEI+ values have a range between 0 and 1. Values below 0.1 denote “low water stress”, values between 0.1 and 0.2 denote “moderate water stress”, “water stress” when this ratio is larger than 0.2, and “severe water stress” if the ratio exceeds 0.4 (Feargemann, 2012).

submit comment