Post a comment on the text below

Figure 4.11. Proportion of classified lakes exposed to different main pressures and impacts in different member states ranked by proportion of good or better ecological status/potential (fig 4.10)

a) Diffuse and point source pollution	b) Nutrient and organic enrichment

c) Contamination	d) Hydromorphology / altered habitats

Notes: The number of classified river water bodies is given in brackets for each member state. Empty rows mean that no data on the specific pressure and/or impact are reported from those member states. These member states are also excluded from the overall EU results. Swedish surface water bodies where the pressure or impact reporting is considered only to be related to airborne mercury contamination are defined as not affected (see text). See appendix for further details.

Source: http://wfd.atkins.dk/report/WFD_aggregation_reports/SWB_pressure_status & http://wfd.atkins.dk/report/WFD_aggregation_reports/SWB_impact_status

Previous comments

Corina Boscornea (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 13 Apr 2012 10:53:39
Romanian input data for Figure 4.11:

Total WBs (lakes) = 131 (all classified) which out:

a) Diffuse and point source pollution
- 9 WBs with point sources pressures (6.87%
- 55 WBs with diffuse sources pressures (41.98%)
b) Nutrient and organic enrichment
- 55 WBs with nutrient enrichments impact (41.98%)
- 41 WBs with organic enrichments impact (31.29%)
c) Contamination
- 60 WBs with contamination impact (45.8%)
d) Hydromorphology / altered habitats - WISE data base need more time to be checked and validated

You cannot post comments to this consultation because you are not authenticated. Please log in.