Post a comment on the text below

Figure 4.19. Ecological status or potential, pressures and impacts of classified transitional water bodies in different member states.  The figure shows the percentage of total number of transitional water bodies in different status classes (a), with and without pressures reported (b), with and without impacts (c).

Notes:  The number of classified river water bodies is given in brackets for each member state. Member States not reporting or not having  transitional waters have been included in the current diagram to ensure the comparability with the coastal diagrams included in the next section. Where ecological status or potential has been reported, empty rows in the pressures and impacts plots mean that no data on pressures and/or impacts are reported from those member states.  Swedish surface water bodies where the pressure or impact reporting is considered only to be related to airborne mercury contamination are defined as not affected (see text). See appendix for further details.

Source: Based on data available in WISE-WFD database primo February 2012,  -  country results on ecological status, pressures and impacts are available here http://wfd.atkins.dk/report/WFD_aggregation_reports/swb_status  &

http://wfd.atkins.dk/report/WFD_aggregation_reports/SWB_pressure_status  & http://wfd.atkins.dk/report/WFD_aggregation_reports/SWB_impact_status