Back to section

Post a comment on the text below

Figure 4.20. Proportion of classified transitional waters exposed to different main pressures and impacts by sea regions and Member States bordering the sea regions.The results are shown in the same order as in figure 4.19.

a)      Diffuse and point source pollution

b)      Nutrient and organic enrichment

c)       Contamination

d)      Hydromorphology / altered habitats

 

Notes:  The number of classified transitional water bodies is given in brackets for each member state. Empty rows mean either that ecological status or potential has not been reported (see figure 4.19a) or that no data on pressures and/or impacts are reported from those member states.  Swedish surface water bodies where the pressure or impact reporting is considered only to be related to airborne mercury contamination are defined as not affected (see text). See appendix for further details.

Source: http://wfd.atkins.dk/report/WFD_aggregation_reports/SWB_pressure_status & http://wfd.atkins.dk/report/WFD_aggregation_reports/SWB_impact_status

Previous comments

  • Corina Boscornea (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 13 Apr 2012 10:58:54

    Romanian input data for Figure 4.20:

    Total WBs (transitional waters) = 2 (all classified) which out:

    a)    Diffuse and point source pollution

    • 1 WBs with point sources pressures (50%)
    • 1 WBs with diffuse sources pressures (50%)

     b)   Nutrient and organic enrichment

    • 2 WBs with nutrient enrichments impact (100%)
    • 0 WBs with organic enrichments impact (0%)

     c)     Contamination

    • 1 WBs with contamination impact (50%)

    d)   Hydromorphology / altered habitats

    • 0 WBs with hydromorphology pressures (0%)
    • 0 WBs with altered habitats impact (0%)

You cannot post comments to this consultation because you are not authenticated. Please log in.