Figure 4.22. Ecological status or potential of classified coastal water bodies in different member states sorted by proportion of good or better ecological status/potential within each sea region. The figure shows the percentage of total number of classified coastal water bodies in different status classes (a), with and without pressures reported (b), with and without impacts (c).
a) Coastal waters - ecological statte |
b)Coastal waters - pressures/no pressures |
c)Coastal waters - impacts/no impacts |
Notes: The number of classified river water bodies is given in brackets for each member state. Empty rows in the pressures and impacts plots mean that no data on pressures and/or impacts are reported from those member states. Swedish surface water bodies where the pressure or impact reporting is considered only to be related to airborne mercury contamination are defined as not affected (see text). See appendix for further details.
Source: Based on data available in WISE-WFD database primo February 2012- country results on ecological status is available here http://wfd.atkins.dk/report/WFD_aggregation_reports/swb_status
You cannot post comments to this consultation because you are not authenticated. Please log in.
Previous comments
"No data" is not appropriate for Cyprus coastal waters.
Relevant data was reported in the Cyprus "EU-summary report Articles 5 & 6" (submitted March 2005), as follows:
Please revise the figure accordingly. We are available for any clarifications.
The data of overseas terriories for France are not taken into account. The results presented here are consequently not comparable to the results presented in figures 3.3 and 3.4.
Romanian input data in figure 4.22:
Total WBs = 4 which out
b) Coastal waters - pressures/no pressures
c) Coastal waters - impacts/no impacts
RO input data for figure 4.22:
Total WBs = 4 which out
b) Coastal waters - pressures/no pressures
c) Coastal waters - impacts/no impacts
Figure 4.22.: Total number of Finnish coastal water bodies should be 215 (without Åland).