Post a comment on the text below

Figure 4.5 Percentage of water bodies per water category being affected by hydromorphological pressures in main pressure groups

Rivers

 

Lakes

Transitional waters

Coastal waters

Note:

Source: WISE-WFD database February 2012; wfd.atkins.dk/report/WFD_aggregation_reports/SWB_pressure_status

Previous comments

  • Ms Sari Mitikka (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 28 Mar 2012 15:38:56

    Missing headings A, B, C and D.

  • duboiaur (Aurelie Dubois) 29 Mar 2012 08:52:22

    Our doubt in France about this classification into five main pressures groups remains. It is very difficult to classify many different pressures in one group. We think that the results shown in this figure are not representative and may be incoherent with the different figures above.

  • austnkar (Kari Austnes) 11 Apr 2012 16:10:17

    Maybe add number of countries in parentheses here as well (as in figure 4.3). And it should still say "classified" in the title.

    I see that you include water abstraction here, which is reasonable. But this is not included in hydromorphology in figure 4.3, at least if this is based on exactly the same data as in figure 5.3 in the ecological status assessment (which it seems like, from visual inspection). This should be clarified in connection with figure 4.3, not to cause confusion.

  • Corina Boscornea (invited by kristpet (disabled)) 13 Apr 2012 09:17:40

    The value at the European level should be review after the sending the input from Romania and another countries.

You cannot post comments to this consultation because you are not authenticated. Please log in.