Post a comment on the text below

  • In some cases member countries will be asked for more stations to increase the spatial coverage or density of stations; or questions on why data have not been reported from some of the RBDs.
  • EEA water quality indicators are for trend assessments based on consistent time series with some gap filling. For a single country consistent time series are established for the defined period (e.g. 1992-2012; or 2000-2012) with some gap filling(e.g. up to 3 years)  and only stations with values for all years in the defined period are used. This ensures that any trend is because of change in the observations and not in the stations included.
  • In the current data set the reporting of some high priority determinands has stopped or there has been change in the determinands in the database e.g.  cadmium changed to dissolved cadmium. EEA wants to clarify if these changes are real changes or it has been errors/misinterpretations introduced in compiling the databases. In addition, the aim is to ensure that the high priority determinands (e.g. nitrate or orthophosphate)  have as complete coverage as possible.

You cannot post comments to this consultation because you are not authenticated. Please log in.