Post a comment on the text below

Table 4.1 Comparison of some management aspects of FD, WFD and BHDs

Directive(s)	FD	WFD	BHDs
Objectives	Assessment and management of flood risk reduce adverse consequences (human health, the environment, cultural heritage and economic activity)	Good Status (ecological and chemical status for surface water, chemical and quantitative status for groundwater) No Deterioration Exemptions	Favourable Conservation Status of protected habitats and species No Deterioration
Scale	RBD (UoM) APSFR country	RBD (and sub-units) Water Body (WB) and WB types specified at biogeographical scale country	Biogeographical region, country, site Habitat Type Species
Instruments	PFRA FHRM FRMP	RBMP Programmes of Measures Normative Definitions (Type, Reference, Intercalibration)	Network of Protected Areas for Habitats/Species Habitats and wild fauna and flora Appropriate Assessment Management Plans
Schedule	6-year management cycle ending 2015, 2021 etc.	6-year management cycle ending 2015, 2021 etc.	6-year reporting cycle ending 2013, 2019 etc.

Source: based on (Workshop preparatory committee 2014) for BHDs and WFD objectives and scale

Previous comments

romaocar (Carlos Romao) 09 Oct 2015 17:11:51

add 'Natura 2000' at the end of 'Network of protected areas for habitats/species'

the end year of the cycle for the 6-year reports is 2012, 2018, etc., the reporting years are 2013, 2019, etc.

You cannot post comments to this consultation because you are not authenticated. Please log in.