Post a comment on the text below

2.6.3.        Rationale uncertainty

In surface waters, ecotoxicologically-based effect thresholds were determined to assess exceedance rates at monitoring sites. Those thresholds indicate a potential pollution by pesticide substances affecting communities in aquatic ecosystems.

In groundwater, exceedances were assessed against the 0.1ug/l quality standard set down in the Groundwater Directive. No regulated quality standards for non-relevant metabolites are available and thus excluded from the assessment.

2.7.       Data sources

Previous comments

  • Volker Laabs (invited by Caroline Whalley) 12 Aug 2021 15:25:46

    First paragraph: As mentioned in one of our comments above, for some pesticides (and metabolites) the precautionary value of 0.1 µg/L was used as lowest AA-EQS to calculate exceedance rates. This is in contradiction to the WFD CIS guidance and therefore the next lowest ecotox-based EQS value from a MS should be used in these cases.

  • mohauvol (Volker Mohaupt) 09 Sep 2021 14:47:50

    Comment from Germany, Federal State Saxonia to 2.7 Data sources:

    Currently PSM active substances are not systematically reported within the framework of WISE6 (SoE), but only on a voluntary basis. As far as we know, there is currently no basis for data provision for nrM. There is no corresponding coding, nor is there a possible core parameter set. In order to have a better data basis for developing the indicator in the future, it would be desirable to include these requirements in the data flow for WISE6.

  • mohauvol (Volker Mohaupt) 09 Sep 2021 17:02:13

    Comment from Germany, Federal State Bavaria to 2.7 Data sources:

    It would be appreciated if the water quality status reportet according to the WFD for water bodies could be used for the indicator instead of data from monitoring sites of SoE-Reporting. Water bodies cover the whole landscape of a country and are monitored representative with a large number of monitoring sites. SoE-Reporting instead cover only watersheds of selected monitoring sites in usually bigger rivers/lakes. In addition WFD set requirements (e.g. analytical standards) which should result in more comparable data.

You cannot post comments to this consultation because you are not authenticated. Please log in.