Post a comment on the text below

Figure 2. Percentage of reported monitoring sites with pesticides exceeding thresholds in surface waters, different sized rivers, lakes and groundwater in European countries in time period 2013 – 2020

Previous comments

eumondid (Didier Eumont) 05 Sep 2022 14:28:51

It could be useful to add a caption to explain how the number of sites or rates are computed : for France case, there is 109 +1080 + 316 + 140 = 1645 sites , but the table indicates a total of 1763
busutell (Ella Busuttil) 06 Sep 2022 13:41:42

Malta has been omitted from this table, when monitoring for pesticides in this reporting period 2013 to 2020 has occurred and no pesticides were detected in groundwater.
erdogayl (Aylin Civan) 08 Sep 2022 08:57:38

If available, additional information could be given for the type of groundwater monitoring sites i.e. monitoring well/spring
guzmolub (Lubomira Guzmova) 09 Sep 2022 20:04:24

At least it needs to add the number of monitored pesticides.
rintapae (Paeivi Rinta) 09 Sep 2022 22:19:59

Switzerland:

We are also not able to reconstruct the total number of reported monitoring sites for groundwater. The number do not correspond the data shown e.g. on the dashboard “Exceedances by Country by Year”.

Could you please provide more information on the methodology?

You cannot post comments to this consultation because you are not authenticated. Please log in.