Post a comment on the text below

Overall, pesticides are grouped in different ways depending on the defining interest group, usage or others. Main classifications are usually based on a biological, chemical or technical basis. Whereas the biological goal seems to be very relevant e.g. the pests they control or the target organisms they kill, inhibit or destroy in one way or another, other important definitions derive from their chemical structure (e.g. organophosphate insecticides or neonicotinoids, organochlorine etc.) or their method of application. The definitions between these groups are rather fluid but most often the classification might clearly define all of the four main pesticide classes: “an insecticidal acetyl-choline esterase inhibiting fumigant pesticide of the organophosphate substance class” (Lewis, et al., 2016).

Based on the given definitions, grouping of pesticides within this report were based on their usage and their mode of action (MoA). This grouping is in a way comparable to the EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) based “Cumulative Assessment Group or CAG” [1].

According to their usage, the report focusses on the three groups (i) herbicides, (ii) insecticides and (iii) fungicides. The herbicides should control unwanted plants, insecticides are used to prevent unwanted insect infestation, and fungicides to kill parasitic fungi or their spores.

The classification according to the MoA of pesticides is oriented towards their effects in the non-human organisms. Table 2.1 lists the different MoA, which were assigned to the pesticides available under Waterbase – Water Quality in the time period 2007 – 2017 (see Annex 5).


[1] Source: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/consultations/call/180508-0

Previous comments

  • Karin Nienstadt (invited by Caroline Whalley) 06 Feb 2020 16:27:05

    the classification of pesticides given in Regulation 1185/2009 (statistics of pesticides) should be considered in this report, for consistency. Also because under this Regulation data on sales and use of PPP at MS level are collected.

  • Angelo Maggiore (invited by Caroline Whalley) 06 Feb 2020 17:55:10

    The mode of action reported in draft EFSA SR is based uniquely on effects on nervous system, which is of course extremely partial when the focus is on the environment and not on humans only. The classification under table 2.1 is indeed more appropriate, but I wouldn't consider it comparable to the one from the draft EFSA SR.

You cannot post comments to this consultation because you are not authenticated. Please log in.