I understand that the scope of the report is resource recovery from 'black' and 'grey' water, but UWWTPs are also receiving industrial wastewater and urban run-off that bring a different pollutant load
The expressions “waste water treatment” and “sewage treatment” are mixed throughout the report. Better to be consistent and only use one of the expressions.
Second bullet: "treatment methods can be energy- and ressource- intensive": the process itself does not require a lot of water.
Proposed addition:
Move the last bullet point up-front and add it to the 3rd bullet point as follows: "Therefore, a key component for longer term circularity of sewage treatment is to ensure that harmful chemicals no longer reach sewage. This requires implementation of the Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability under the European Green Deal."
Modify the bullet on GHG as follows: "
need to distinguish between sewage and sewage sludge. I believe you are talking here about the sewage sludge
need to distinguish between sewage and sewage sludge. I believe you are talking here about the sewage sludge
In addition, you may want to precise this is about "urban" sewage sludge and not industrial.
reference to climate change, reclamation of water in the key messages us not mentioned as part of the circularity approach.
Also, no mention of impact of industrial effluents is noted as this is a major part of urban wastewater
How about WEFE as a nexus. It can be mentioned.
In all, the key messages can be significantly widened. As is they offer a very narrow view of the problem
Add in between bullet 1 and 2:
Add underlined text to the third bullet
you may want to add an example of sludge management that has a GHG impact: "... to sludge management like landfills."